<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should images be copied at full size?</title>
	<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size</link>
	<description>Software that helps people visualize and use information</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Gutherson</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21519</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21519</guid>
					<description>It is much better to paste the image at full size into the clipboard. If the smaller image is used in the clipboard, then it needs to be enlarged later there will be significant image degradation (this was a common problem in photoshop before 'smart objects'.
Of course this only applies to bitmapped images, vector files will be unaffected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It is much better to paste the image at full size into the clipboard. If the smaller image is used in the clipboard, then it needs to be enlarged later there will be significant image degradation (this was a common problem in photoshop before &#8217;smart objects&#8217;.<br />
Of course this only applies to bitmapped images, vector files will be unaffected.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brett Bumeter</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21521</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21521</guid>
					<description>It would be much better to paste at actual size.

WYSWIG can only go so far and I usually want to do something with the map outside of MM when I take the time to put a picture into a topic.

Of course, I'd always be happing with having a preference setting (check box ) that would allow me to configure MMPro6 for this in the way I prefer.  Maybe the Basic version could come with out the preference settings and default to actual size.




As images go, I'd be a lot more happy, if I could find better ways to get high quality images exported from MMPro 6 so that I could use the images more effectively in my websites and blog articles.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mavenmapper.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Maven Mapper's Information&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It would be much better to paste at actual size.</p>
	<p>WYSWIG can only go so far and I usually want to do something with the map outside of MM when I take the time to put a picture into a topic.</p>
	<p>Of course, I&#8217;d always be happing with having a preference setting (check box ) that would allow me to configure MMPro6 for this in the way I prefer.  Maybe the Basic version could come with out the preference settings and default to actual size.</p>
	<p>As images go, I&#8217;d be a lot more happy, if I could find better ways to get high quality images exported from MMPro 6 so that I could use the images more effectively in my websites and blog articles.</p>
	<p><a href="http://mavenmapper.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Maven Mapper&#8217;s Information</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pado</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21559</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21559</guid>
					<description>Full size please.  And, by the way, can we have subscripts and superscripts in the text please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Full size please.  And, by the way, can we have subscripts and superscripts in the text please!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bostjan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21580</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21580</guid>
					<description>The best solution is full size and no check boxes. The more options, more confusement for the users.

(You can always resize the image in that other program)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The best solution is full size and no check boxes. The more options, more confusement for the users.</p>
	<p>(You can always resize the image in that other program)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21581</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21581</guid>
					<description>I think full-size would be preferable.
When you resize it in MM, generally it's to conserve real estate in your map. 

You can't predict what uses the user has for the image outside MM (put it in a powerpoint slide, manipulate it in photoshop, publish to web etc.) so it would be important to retain the original size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think full-size would be preferable.<br />
When you resize it in MM, generally it&#8217;s to conserve real estate in your map. </p>
	<p>You can&#8217;t predict what uses the user has for the image outside MM (put it in a powerpoint slide, manipulate it in photoshop, publish to web etc.) so it would be important to retain the original size.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Colin Horner</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21582</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21582</guid>
					<description>I would recommend full size.  The customised sizing in MM is specific to use in the map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I would recommend full size.  The customised sizing in MM is specific to use in the map.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brett Bumeter</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21585</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21585</guid>
					<description>An old idea of mine came back to me this morning in the shower.  I would still love to be able to embed flash videos (ergo YouTube, GoogleVideo, even Microsoft SoapBox videos) within topics of a mindmap.

We can't learn to fly before we can walk and with that in mind if these items will ever be successfully embedded this image size setting becomes relevant for one of the milestones on the journey.

Users need to be able to 

1.  set the size of the image defined by pixel width

or 

2.  Know that the pixel width of an image that they insert into a topic will remain constant (during the insertion, if they want to manually resize it that's a different deal, but even then MindManager should give them some tools for image properties)

Why?

If we could insert an image, knowing the size up front and being able to rely on that size staying the same, we could create maps with 'filler images' (a common web design practice).  The map could then be exported to a web page where the filler images could be replaced with embedded flash videos of the same size and shape.

Make the options set to a standard setting so the average user doesn't get confused, and provide an easy access to reset the settings to default, but do provide the means to work with the preferences for the users trying to get value out of MindManager, just like the value that can now be had from customizing a map before exporting it into PowerPoint.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>An old idea of mine came back to me this morning in the shower.  I would still love to be able to embed flash videos (ergo YouTube, GoogleVideo, even Microsoft SoapBox videos) within topics of a mindmap.</p>
	<p>We can&#8217;t learn to fly before we can walk and with that in mind if these items will ever be successfully embedded this image size setting becomes relevant for one of the milestones on the journey.</p>
	<p>Users need to be able to </p>
	<p>1.  set the size of the image defined by pixel width</p>
	<p>or </p>
	<p>2.  Know that the pixel width of an image that they insert into a topic will remain constant (during the insertion, if they want to manually resize it that&#8217;s a different deal, but even then MindManager should give them some tools for image properties)</p>
	<p>Why?</p>
	<p>If we could insert an image, knowing the size up front and being able to rely on that size staying the same, we could create maps with &#8216;filler images&#8217; (a common web design practice).  The map could then be exported to a web page where the filler images could be replaced with embedded flash videos of the same size and shape.</p>
	<p>Make the options set to a standard setting so the average user doesn&#8217;t get confused, and provide an easy access to reset the settings to default, but do provide the means to work with the preferences for the users trying to get value out of MindManager, just like the value that can now be had from customizing a map before exporting it into PowerPoint.  <img src='http://blog.mindjet.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luciano Passuello</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21595</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21595</guid>
					<description>Definitely full size. 

It is totally counter-intuitive to have regular commands do different things based on the current zoom level - it's only a view, after all. &quot;Copy&quot; should act on the underlying object (the full size image, in this case), independent of the current view of the object.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Definitely full size. </p>
	<p>It is totally counter-intuitive to have regular commands do different things based on the current zoom level - it&#8217;s only a view, after all. &#8220;Copy&#8221; should act on the underlying object (the full size image, in this case), independent of the current view of the object.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Harris</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21598</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21598</guid>
					<description>Full Size image if MM is storing the full size image - don't scale/distort the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Full Size image if MM is storing the full size image - don&#8217;t scale/distort the image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: C</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21599</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mindjet.com/2006/11/should-images-be-copied-at-full-size#comment-21599</guid>
					<description>Full size, for sure.  That way you eliminate uncertainty about what you are dealing with.

However...one of my big beefs with MindManager is that there are no options for handling images at all.  With all due respect to someone who commented above that users should not be given choices, I think a lack of options here is a major weakness.

For example: I am an MBA student and wanted to use MM for class notes.  Since our professors usually provide PowerPoint slides before class, it was my intention to copy and paste images of his slides into Topics and then add my own comments as sub topics.  This simple idea turned out to be untenable for two reasons: 
1.  I have to manually resize every image by dragging selection points with my mouse.  With 40-60 slides, that would take about an hour.
2.  The pasted images of Powerpoint slides are somehow add much, larger in .mmap files than simply pasting the same images into MS Word (as meta files).  One image in MM &quot;costs&quot; about 300K.  The same image in MS Word &quot;costs&quot; only 9K.  

When my bogged down class notes .mmap file quickly exceeded 40MB, I gave up on what I thought was a great idea for taking notes (in school or in business meetings).

So, to summarize:
1.  Keep images at full size as a default.
2.  Provide a way to resize images consistently and quickly (i.e. the ability to use the keyboard to access an option to resize by specific percentages -- see Powerpoint for inspiration).
3.  Figure out why images are so much larger in MM than in MS Office apps.  Is it the image format?  If so, provide some other image format that takes less space.

Thanks!

C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Full size, for sure.  That way you eliminate uncertainty about what you are dealing with.</p>
	<p>However&#8230;one of my big beefs with MindManager is that there are no options for handling images at all.  With all due respect to someone who commented above that users should not be given choices, I think a lack of options here is a major weakness.</p>
	<p>For example: I am an MBA student and wanted to use MM for class notes.  Since our professors usually provide PowerPoint slides before class, it was my intention to copy and paste images of his slides into Topics and then add my own comments as sub topics.  This simple idea turned out to be untenable for two reasons:<br />
1.  I have to manually resize every image by dragging selection points with my mouse.  With 40-60 slides, that would take about an hour.<br />
2.  The pasted images of Powerpoint slides are somehow add much, larger in .mmap files than simply pasting the same images into MS Word (as meta files).  One image in MM &#8220;costs&#8221; about 300K.  The same image in MS Word &#8220;costs&#8221; only 9K.  </p>
	<p>When my bogged down class notes .mmap file quickly exceeded 40MB, I gave up on what I thought was a great idea for taking notes (in school or in business meetings).</p>
	<p>So, to summarize:<br />
1.  Keep images at full size as a default.<br />
2.  Provide a way to resize images consistently and quickly (i.e. the ability to use the keyboard to access an option to resize by specific percentages &#8212; see Powerpoint for inspiration).<br />
3.  Figure out why images are so much larger in MM than in MS Office apps.  Is it the image format?  If so, provide some other image format that takes less space.</p>
	<p>Thanks!</p>
	<p>C
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
